GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2024
Status
Forthcoming
Abstract
This chapter argues that the competing American ballot-box and European fundamental rights paradigms of regulatory law have marked the specific domain of digital regulation. These regulatory paradigms and their associated state interests are projected extraterritorially through the market power of Silicon Valley, on the one hand, and the privacy rights of European Union (EU) regulators, on the other hand. This chapter also analyzes recent developments in the EU, where there is now a state effort to make digital markets and, relatedly, an emerging preference for some data localization to promote both fundamental rights and economic and security interests. In China, we observe the emergence of a layered form of digital regulation: at the deepest level is state control of digital infrastructure, industry actors, and civil society users; layered on top is an attempt to improve the position of consumers through both digital platform regulation and competition law applied to the largest oligopolies. As a result, the earlier Chinese strategy of data localization is now complemented by a bureaucratically controlled form of extraterritorial engagement.
GW Paper Series
2024-24
SSRN Link
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4778013
Recommended Citation
Oxford Handbook on Digital Constitutionalism (Giovanni De Gregorio, Oreste Pollicino & Peggy Valcke eds., forthcoming)