Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2017
Status
Accepted
Abstract
While the result of the Supreme Court's decision in Impression Products is defensible, the opinion's lack of sophistication makes the case seem easier than it was, unnecessarily sowing the seeds of potential future confusion.
GW Paper Series
GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2017-68; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2017-68
SSRN Link
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992391
Recommended Citation
Michaels, Andrew C., Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.: A Glib Rebuke of the Federal Circuit (June 11, 2017). Andrew C. Michaels, Response, Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.: A Glib Rebuke of the Federal Circuit, GEO. WASH. L. REV. ON THE DOCKET (June 11, 2017), http://www.gwlr.org/impression-products-v-lexmark/.; GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2017-68; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2017-68. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992391