Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.: A Glib Rebuke of the Federal Circuit

Authors

Andrew Michaels, The George Washington University Law School

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2017

Status

Accepted

Abstract

While the result of the Supreme Court's decision in Impression Products is defensible, the opinion's lack of sophistication makes the case seem easier than it was, unnecessarily sowing the seeds of potential future confusion.

GW Paper Series

GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2017-68; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2017-68

SSRN Link

https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992391

Recommended Citation

Michaels, Andrew C., Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.: A Glib Rebuke of the Federal Circuit (June 11, 2017). Andrew C. Michaels, Response, Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.: A Glib Rebuke of the Federal Circuit, GEO. WASH. L. REV. ON THE DOCKET (June 11, 2017), http://www.gwlr.org/impression-products-v-lexmark/.; GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2017-68; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2017-68. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992391