Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2018
Status
Accepted
Abstract
Bid protests -- vendors’ challenges to contracting officials’ errors, either before or after award -- have been an established part of federal procurement for at least a century. Protests (sometimes called “challenges” or “remedies proceedings” abroad) are a recognized bulwark against corruption in the United States, and have become a standard part of procurement systems around the world, often at the urging of the United States. But new proposals being considered for U.S. government procurement in practice could dramatically limit bid protests, in the name of streamlining the procurement process. This drastic change to U.S. procurement practices could violate international agreements under which the United States has agreed to maintain an effective bid protest system, and could raise new risks of corruption in procurement.
GW Paper Series
GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2018-26; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2018-26
SSRN Link
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3176223
Recommended Citation
Yukins, Christopher R. and Ramish, Dan, Section 809 and “E-Portal” Proposals, by Cutting Bid Protests in Federal Procurement, Could Breach International Agreements and Raise New Risks of Corruption (2018). Christopher Yukins & Daniel Ramish, Section 809 and “e-Portal” Proposals, By Cutting Bid Protests in Federal Procurement, Could Breach International Agreements and Raise New Risks of Corruption, 60 GOV’T CONTRACTOR ¶ 138 (2018).; GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2018-26; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2018-26. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3176223