Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2012

Status

Accepted

Abstract

This article examines State v. McLaughlin, 14 A.3d 720 (N.J. 2011) to illustrate the importance of the hearsay rule to resolving the admissibility issue of a declarant's statement of an intention to do a future act to prove the acts of another person.

GW Paper Series

GW Law School Public Law and Legal Theory Paper No. 2012-153; GW Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-153

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS