Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2014

Status

Accepted

Abstract

This article mainly examines United States v. Delgado-Marrero, 744 F.3d 167 (1st Cir. 2014), to illustrate the difficulty courts still have when considering Federal Rule of Evidence 608(b)'s ban on extrinsic evidence. The prosecutor's other arguments are also examined under Federal Rules of Evidence 403 and 404(b)(1).

GW Paper Series

GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2014-61; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014-61

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS